Ssssssssnakes!
Conversation at work today:
D.: Thththththth....
Me: It's not a lisp! Ssssssss!
D.: I can't!
Me: Sure you can. Like a snake: hissssssss!
D.: A gay snake, maybe.
Me: That's redundant. All snakes are gay. Look at the shape.
D.: So what do they do, adopt?
Me: Recruit.
Comments
Damnit. No snatching my "queeniest gay at the office" tiara. I'll have to cut you!
Posted by: Lee(Skittles) | January 27, 2005 06:50 AM
Nature has no purpose.
You don't understand population mechanics, much less evolutionary theories.
What's unnatural is any individual diverting its own natural sexuality (and sexual activity) in favor of such artificial phenomena like religion and dogma.
If you're going to argue science, then learn it first before you attempt to wield it as a weapon.
Until then, perhaps you should try to recognize absurdist humor when it crosses your path.
Posted by: God of Biscuits | January 28, 2005 09:20 AM
*ponderous humming*
Adoption and recruiting in gay communities...
You know, doesn't it strike you odd that a completely gay community couldn't survive on it's own? One generation, and you'd be down for the count. And this is definitely not to say that we should just round up gay people and make them life in concentration camps or anything like that. But a completely gay community couldn't survive, does nothing to continue itself or further the human species. It could sruvive as long as there were hetero couples still making babies, but without them it would die out. Could it be that being gay is unnatural, at least in that respect?
Again, don't tell me about how people are born gay, that's not what I'm talking about. Some people might "naturally" have the urge to eat bricks, that doesn't make it a good thing. I think that although homosexuality might be "natural" in the "instinctive" sense of the word, it's unnatural in the sense that it has no purpose in nature.
Posted by: The Masked Avenger | January 28, 2005 09:54 AM
Sir, once again I appreciate your response but still must intrude once more and ask for an answer. Telling me I don't understand the situation doesn't count if you cannot explain it better.
Everything has a purpose.
Posted by: The Masked Avenger | January 31, 2005 12:14 PM
I answered. I'm sorry that it doesn't quite get through the thick wall of dogma.
Who says that everything has a purpose? Where'd you get that idea?
I don't see purpose when I look around in nature. I see people with purpose, but human purposes beyond eating, drinking, fucking and excreting are fabricated by...humans.
Posted by: God of Biscuits | January 31, 2005 12:19 PM