Move Over, Ann Coulter
Why do so many people who think so little of themselves go running and screaming for the nearest pulpit?Trying to make the outside match the inside, I suppose.
Anyhow, back in the day, Phyllis Schlafly was the Queen Bitch Extraordinaire, championing “family values” at the expense of her own family.
More recently, there's the horrible, horrible trash known as Ann Coulter, or, chupacabra, if you will.
I'm here to tell you, there's a new (and not so new) shrill black-souled idiot on the move: Michelle Malkin. Her latest book is entitled “In Defense of Internment: The Case for 'Racial Profiling' in World War II and the War on Terror”.
Yes, an Asian-American woman who argues in favor of rounding people up, seizing everything they own and locking them away in camps with horrible conditions, simply because they physically resemble the enemy of the state.
So I guess the Dirty Jews had it coming from the Fatherland, huh?*
Or maybe, just maybe, she's just on the rag with her ching-chong-ching-chong blatherings*.
Isn't Racial Profiling a HOOT?
Most horribly, however, Malkin has spawned. Maybe we should start a therapy fund for that poor child now?
*For the irony-impaired: the Nazis and Michelle Malkin are Wrong.
Comments
Yes, an Asian-American woman who argues in favor of rounding people up, seizing everything they own and locking them away in camps with horrible conditions, simply because they physically resemble the enemy of the state.
So you've read the book to make such an informed opinion on it?
Or are you just regurjitating the talking points that you read somewhere else?
Posted by: Mad Mikey | December 13, 2004 01:19 AM
"In Defense of Internment".
Seriously, please tell me exactly which part of those four words doesn't make your blood boil?
I've read a lot on the history of the internment camps in this country. And I know what I was "taught" when I was growing up, which I had to unlearn later.
I don't accept "talking points" as anything other than truth bent to serve a separate goal, often a goal that's in conflict with the truth itself.
Why are you presuming that either reading the book in its entirety or 'regurgitating talking points' are the only avenues for discussion and opinion?
Posted by: GodOfBiscuits | December 13, 2004 02:12 AM
I wanted to say something pithy about repression and self loathing and using identifying with your oprressor as an escape mechanism, but sadly I can only summon pissy. Good thing I don't have the stereotypical lisp so that you can tell the two apart.
Posted by: Lee(Skittles) | December 13, 2004 05:48 AM
Why is it that people like Michelle, Anne, Sean, Bill, or Rush can so easily announce that Liberals are haters when they are busy hating other people with such venom? Michelle Malkin's new book is just too weird, she's gotta be totally fucked up.
Posted by: homer | December 13, 2004 09:44 AM
*It* accuses you of racism, despite the obvious disclaimer. Then *it* goes and uses the same theoretically offensive 'accent' it *it's* reply without any such disclaimer. *It* obviously needs to examine *it's* own values.
And as for Joe, given the things you find HOT in your blog, I'm not sure I wan't my lisp to be HOT. :)
Posted by: Lee(Skittles) | December 14, 2004 06:31 AM
Lee...I have *always* thought your lisp is HOT.
Posted by: Joe | December 14, 2004 08:31 AM
"ching-chong-ching-chong blatherings." When you use derogatory and humorless language like that, it's easy to understand how internment happened in the first place.
Posted by: Gay Dork | December 14, 2004 10:33 AM
It's called sarcasm and irony.
Or didn't you see the *'s and the note at the bottom for people like you?
Yikes.
Posted by: GodOfBiscuits | December 14, 2004 10:37 AM
AHH SO. Me not lookee at bottom of scleen.
Posted by: Gay Dork | December 14, 2004 11:07 AM
If you have a bigger point, I suggest you make it. And soon.
Posted by: GodOfBiscuits | December 14, 2004 11:16 AM
GoB,
Warning on mad mikey, he is nothing more than a minion from dogs knot. Only here to cause trouble. Unable to have an intelligent adult discussion.
Just wanted to warn you.
Posted by: nunya | December 15, 2004 07:13 AM
Saw Michelle Malkin on that balding liberal guy's show that features a guest panel of 3 (a celebrity, a liberal, a conservative), I forget his name...Maher? Anyway, Malkin's just another obnoxious media whore cashing in on the whole blue/red, liberal/conservative crap that's infected this nation. We are all more purple, actually. How many people you know who are as extreme, either liberal or conservative? I think people like her and their liberal opposites are bad icons to look up to and listen to. It defeats discourse in this nation.
Posted by: jimbo | December 17, 2004 12:33 PM
"there's a new nasty, hateful, self-loathing bitch in town..."
A little competion for you.
BTW - noticed you linked to us again last week. If you're that desperate for traffic, just drop me an email next time. I have an idea.
Posted by: Gordon the Magnificent | December 19, 2004 09:20 AM
Gordon, most of the traffic from your site was personally from you and/or Geoff. And that was like, 1 a day.
Thanks for the voluminous traffic, git. Keep talkin' shit.
And continue being a perfect example of reactionary stupidity, and you'll continue to be referenced as one.
Get it?
Posted by: GodOfBiscuits | December 19, 2004 09:36 AM
Get what? You're a stalker obsessed with Dog snot?
I already knew pyscho.
Posted by: Gordon the Magnificent | December 20, 2004 10:44 AM
You're just easy, Gordon.
Low-hanging fruit. Like Bill O'Reilly or Ann Coulter.
Stupid, bombastic, anti-gravitas, anti-thinking, shrill screeding.
Posted by: GodOfBiscuits | December 20, 2004 10:52 AM